Here are some early notes in no particular order. There is no real outline yet.
Sex in Deep Time; or Shaken By Creation
Love plus sex equals SLEX. Or SLOVE?
To say one is a 'follower' of Eternalism might not be an appropriate word. Because in Eternalism one follows themselves first and foremost, brings their own personal experience with Time to the movement, and grows from their own inner knowledge. Sharing these experiences and learning from the experiences of other Eternalists is vital to each member of the group.
It is appropriate to define Eternalism as a mental, physical and spiritual experience. The experience is TACTILE, that is, actual, real and undeniable.
The most important factor in reading my perspective of Eternalism as applied to sex is that words themselves are temporary tools. Sex, however, like Time, is forever. Can we say then that sex IS Time. Hold on, let's not get ahead of ourselves.
The use of my words here can and will change in time due to the natural alterations of the language. Whenever you feel my words ring true, do not take them too strongly literally UNLESS you can consciously back my words up with your own experience. If you find it is TRUE to your experience, then it IS TRUE.
Examine, for instance, this sentence which pertains to sex;
The difference between a girl and a woman is that a woman controls children, but a girl has yet to attain the degree of knowledge required to control children.
True? Not true?
Here's another; In general, it is easier to pursue two women to kiss than it is to get two men to kiss, and that is because men fear potential homosexuality more than women do, and THAT is because women in general have a deeper fear of unwanted pregnancy, and intimacy with a woman does not have that potential.
True? Not true?
We make assumptions about the reasons others think the way they do. We often link their thinking with society and pop culture, some from childhood influences, parents, upbringing, etc. But it's a rare speculation that perhaps our thoughts come directly from others, that we pick up on what they are thinking, as they do with us, in an immediate telepathy.
*************************************
Recently my paternal grandfather, who I never knew, has been of intense interest to me.
The art of overpopulation, if it has any carnality to it at all, always cheapens life.
Language requires us to develop borders, defining where one thing begins and another ends, though in reality they flow together, become a vital function to one another. Where does the ball sack end and the penis begin? Surgeons may remove one or the other. So it is also with our sexual feelings.
In the future battles will be fought, and the men who are captured will be turned into women against their will. What we decide now about the morality of such a situation will have great influence when this inevitability occurs. To ignore the issue now, or to laugh it off will also effect how it is dealt with, as apathy is seen as agreement to those who make the final decisions on such things.
Feminizing captured male soldiers is not an entirely new occurrence, it's just that we have to go way back to the ancient world to find institutionalized examples. In Allen Edwardes wonderful book 'The Jewel In The Lotus' (1959), he tells of in-battle castrations and male brothels where ex-soldiers are enslaved, mutilated and forced to work as female prostitutes. Why, you might ask, would there be a resurgence of such perversion in the modern world? Haven't we progressed enough as a species to be beyond such barbaric practices?
Of course, the world news tells us we haven't.
The mind knows the difference between actual and told experience. That is why true, or rather total hypnosis doesn't work.
Every organism that is created within Time is possessed of singular talents.
Yours are SPECTRAL, my dear.